In the aftermath of the recent dramatic events in Washington, Sir Keir Starmer, the UK Prime Minister, has chosen a remarkably reserved response given the significant geopolitical implications. The incident in question involves the United States' unprecedented move to seize Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife from Caracas. In light of such gravity, Sir Keir's language on whether this act constitutes a breach of international law has been notably cautious.
This measured stance is not entirely unexpected from Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer, a former international human rights lawyer. The Labour Party's manifesto has clearly stated its commitment to upholding the international rule of law, a principle found on page 117 of their document. In a social media message, Starmer reiterated the UK's support for a peaceful transition of power in Venezuela, yet refrained from commenting on the methods employed to achieve this transition.
His approach exemplifies a broader strategy adopted by the administration towards a US president perceived as unpredictable: avoid public commentary, act pragmatically, and keep discussions behind closed doors. Noteworthy is the fact that there has been no direct communication between the Prime Minister and President Trump since the incident involving Maduro and his wife unfolded.
A year prior, recognizing Trump's imminent return to the White House, Starmer resolved to eschew public disputes with the US President, assessing that it was more beneficial to nurture a constructive relationship with the White House. This diplomatic tact has borne fruit, with Labour supporters citing a beneficial agreement with the US to mitigate tariff impacts, potentially saving thousands of UK jobs.
However, this stance of non-confrontation has drawn criticism from various quarters, including the Liberal Democrats, Scottish National Party, and Green Party of England and Wales. Even within Labour, some backbenchers have expressed their dissatisfaction, critiquing Starmer's reluctance in more strongly denouncing Trump's actions. When Starmer stated, "it is for the US to justify the actions it has taken," detractors argue it afforded unwarranted endorsement to Trump's maneuver.
Contrastingly, the Conservative leadership has largely endorsed Starmer's restrained position. Among Labour ranks, while dissatisfaction does exist, it seems more subdued, with some MPs expressing understanding of the need for caution in dealing with an unpredictable US President. "We recognize that Trump is a massive loose cannon and Starmer is having to go very canny right now," commented one Labour MP, indicative of the complex balancing act currently undertaken by the UK government.